From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Gatliff Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] [PWM] Generic PWM API implementation Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:16:08 -0600 Message-ID: <4910AD88.2000200@billgatliff.com> References: <8bd0f97a0810170859k72dc1bc5o34ed2388f95c3bc8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0810170859k72dc1bc5o34ed2388f95c3bc8@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 14:14, Bill Gatliff wrote: >> +int pwm_register(struct pwm_device *pwm) >> +{ >> + struct pwm_channel *p; >> + int wchan; >> + int ret = 0; > > the initialization to 0 here isnt needed This is literally the only feedback I have received. I take that to mean that the code basically works as advertised, and nobody else has any problems with it (it continues to work fine for me here). So, what's the next step? How do I advocate for getting this API into mainline? b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@billgatliff.com