From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]: Replace kernel/timeconst.pl with kernel/timeconst.sh Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:39:36 -0800 Message-ID: <49611E88.6010204@zytor.com> References: <200901020207.30359.rob@landley.net> <200901031932.51873.rob@landley.net> <20090104120735.72840fdb@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <200901041303.12687.rob@landley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200901041303.12687.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Rob Landley Cc: Alan Cox , Sam Ravnborg , Embedded Linux mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Rob Landley wrote: > > C) The only calculation which can overflow 64 bits (the ADJ32 one) turns out > not to need arbitrary precision math, just 72 bits, and if it ever uses more > than 32 then bottom 32 are all zero before the divide so you can do it in > three lines. > ... for the current code (32 bits). When we get an overflow-less 64-bit implementation, this code will have to be redone, which is not true for a properly done implementation. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.