From: Marco <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] Pramfs: Include files
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:07:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3E68CD.6080803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906140059.57362.arnd@arndb.de>
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 13 June 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> + union {
>>> + struct {
>>> + /*
>>> + * ptr to row block of 2D block pointer array,
>>> + * file block #'s 0 to (blocksize/4)^2 - 1.
>>> + */
>>> + off_t row_block;
>> It is my understanding that we shall use: __kernel_off_t
>> in exported headers.
>
> That is a correct understanding in general, however this case is
> different, because it describes an on-disk data structure,
> not a kernel to user space interface. Here, __kernel_off_t is just
> as wrong as off_t, because it will differ between 32 and 64 bit
> architectures, making the fs layout incompatible. I'd suggest
> simply defining this as __u64.
>
> Moreover, file system layout should be described in terms of
> big-endian or little-endian types (e.g. __be64 or __le64),
> together with the right accessor functions.
>
> Arnd <><
>
I was thinking about your comment and I think I'll use __kernel_off_t
for the exported headers. I know that it will differ between 32 and 64
bit architectures, but for this kind of fs there isn't any compatibility
problem at layout level. You cannot remove a chip of RAM from a board
32bit little endian and attach it to a board with a cpu 64bit big
endian, the memory isn't a disk. Indeed, I see that tmpfs uses simply
"unsigned long" in the exported header file without any problems to
little or big endian.
Regards,
Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-21 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-13 13:21 [PATCH 06/14] Pramfs: Include files Marco
2009-06-13 14:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-13 22:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-14 7:15 ` Marco
2009-06-21 17:07 ` Marco [this message]
2009-06-21 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-22 6:23 ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-22 11:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-22 18:05 ` Marco
2009-06-22 18:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-22 19:31 ` Chris Simmonds
2009-06-22 20:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-22 22:00 ` Tim Bird
2009-06-23 4:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-23 17:38 ` Marco
2009-06-23 19:26 ` Jörn Engel
2009-06-23 21:15 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-23 21:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-24 6:32 ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-24 15:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-24 16:49 ` Marco
2009-06-22 21:41 ` Jörn Engel
2009-06-22 22:20 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-23 5:57 ` Jörn Engel
2009-06-23 8:31 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-22 23:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-23 6:40 ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-14 7:15 ` Marco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3E68CD.6080803@gmail.com \
--to=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).