linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
To: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>,
	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:06:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8A7D38.5020201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090815103532.GA5596@sig21.net>

Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:43:05PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:04:57PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>>>> rsc@thebe:~$ microcom | ptx_ts "U-Boot 2.0.0-rc9"
> 
>>>> [  7.137924] <  0.059316> starting udev
>>>> [  7.147925] <  0.010001> mounting tmpfs at /dev
>>>> [  7.182299] <  0.034374> creating static nodes
>>>> [  7.410613] <  0.228314> starting udevd...done
>>>> [  8.811097] <  1.400484> waiting for devices...done
> 
> And suddenly devtmpfs sounds like a good idea ;-)
> 
> We use static device nodes during boot, and later
> setup busybox mdev for hotplug.
> 
> 
> Johannes
> 

Yeah, I agree, do you really need udevd, device file creation at every
start-up in /dev? Usually static devices nodes and mdev for hotplug are
enough or at least you could use a simple script to create only once
time the devices file (mdev -s). About the fs, do you really need a
rootfs with ubifs? I mean, you could "split" your fs. You could use a
read-only fs (SquashFS for example) for your root-fs, ubifs for
permanent storage data (mounted under /data for example) and a ram fs
for volatile data.

Marco

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-18 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 17:02 New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:19 ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-14 18:46   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-14 18:58     ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:57   ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:01     ` Linus Walleij
2009-08-14 21:15       ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:35       ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-15  6:21         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-14 20:04 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-14 20:43   ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-15  5:59     ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-15 10:35     ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-18 10:06       ` Marco Stornelli [this message]
2009-08-18 10:21         ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:34           ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:44             ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:48               ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:53                 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-09-04 16:16       ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-09 14:33         ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-09-10  0:03           ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-17 19:15     ` Tim Bird
2009-08-17 22:35       ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot (was Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM) Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:03         ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot David Miller
2009-08-18  1:24           ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:27             ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:40               ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:56                 ` David Miller
2009-08-19 11:57                 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-18  4:56               ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-18  5:00                 ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:31           ` Rick Jones
2009-08-18  2:45             ` david
2009-08-18  4:56               ` Willy Tarreau
2009-08-15  6:14   ` New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-18 14:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-18 15:31   ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-18 16:34     ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 18:23     ` Tim Bird
2009-08-19  7:21     ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-19 16:20       ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-20  8:57         ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A8A7D38.5020201@gmail.com \
    --to=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=js@sig21.net \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).