From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francesco VIRLINZI Subject: Re: [Proposal] [PATCH] generic clock framework Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:54:33 +0100 Message-ID: <4AFA6DB9.1010307@st.com> References: <4AF98175.4090205@st.com> <4AF9AC3B.2070004@am.sony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AF9AC3B.2070004@am.sony.com> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Tim Bird Cc: Linux-sh , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Tim Thanks for your feedback. ARM mail list was already involved. Regards Francesco On 11/10/2009 07:08 PM, Tim Bird wrote: > Francesco VIRLINZI wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I'm Francesco and I work in STMicroelectronics >> >> In the last ELC-E_2009 I spoke on a generic clock framework I'm working on >> (see >> http://tree.celinuxforum.org/CelfPubWiki/ELCEurope2009Presentations?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=ELC_E_2009_Generic_Clock_Framework.pdf). >> >> >> I wrote the gcf to manage both clocks the platform_devices during a >> clock operation. >> > This looks good to me, in principle, but I'm not a clock or PM > expert. I would recommend sending this to the linux-kernel and > linux-pm lists as well. I think you'll get a wider audience for > feedback. > -- Tim > > ============================= > Tim Bird > Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum > Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America > ============================= > > >