linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Generic PWM API implementation
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:54:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B02C726.6070607@billgatliff.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911170027.38664.david-b@pacbell.net>

David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 13 November 2009, Grant Likely wrote:
>   
>> I'm concerned about the approach taken here.  As I understand it, the
>> PWM signals are very similar to GPIOs in that each PWM device controls
>> an external signal line, just like GPIO lines.
>>     
>
> PWM is not GPIO, and doesn't fit into a GPIO framework.
>
> Since *everything* boils down to one or more signal lines,
> your argument leads directly to Linux having no native
> hardware interface except GPIOs.  Not ... practical. ;)
>   

Wait.  Isn't that what Ubicom's chips do?  :)


> If you want to combine PWM with something else ... timers would
> be a better target.  They're both fundamentally about periodic
> phenomena.  And quite a lot of timers support PWM output modes...
>
> (A generic interface to hardware timers is lacking, too.)
>   

True, and I have code (not yet published) to support a couple of
timer/counter peripherals under the PWM interface.  So for that
functionality at least, I don't think a more generic or standalone API
is necessary.

I don't know how to define a generic interface for the counter a.k.a.
"input capture" behavior of such devices, though.  Still an unsolved
problem, but I don't think it will be a part of the PWM API.  It's a
different metaphor.


> GPIOs, on the other hand, are packaged for manual bit
> twiddling.  While it's possible to create low-speed
> implementations of serial protocols using GPIOs (like
> 2-wire/I2C, one-wire, and various SPI variants), those
> are explicitly the high-overhead (and low performance)
> substitutes, to be used only when native hardware isn't
> available (or is broken etc).
>   

And when using GPIO to generate I2C or SPI signals, you don't do it
through the GPIO interface--- you do it through the I2C or SPI
interface, and a driver behind that API talks to the GPIO API.... or to
a different driver if you change your mind.  Same idea for the PWM API.


-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-17 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-15 18:14 [PATCH 0/6] Generic PWM API implementation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] [PWM] " Bill Gatliff
2008-10-17 15:59   ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-04 20:16     ` Bill Gatliff
2008-11-04 20:51       ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-04 23:55       ` David Brownell
2008-11-05  0:17         ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-05  2:59           ` Bill Gatliff
2008-11-05  5:08           ` David Brownell
2008-11-05  2:56         ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] [PWM] Changes to existing include/linux/pwm.h to adapt to generic PWM API Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] [PWM] Documentation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] [PWM] Driver for Atmel PWMC peripheral Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] [PWM] Install new Atmel PWMC driver in Kconfig, expunge old one Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] [PWM] New LED driver and trigger that use PWM API Bill Gatliff
2009-11-13 19:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] Generic PWM API implementation Grant Likely
2009-11-14  4:22   ` Mike Frysinger
2009-11-14  7:55     ` Grant Likely
2009-11-17  7:47       ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:48         ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-17 16:53           ` David Brownell
2009-11-20 22:51             ` Grant Likely
2009-11-20 22:14         ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 14:12           ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-23 17:39             ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 20:51               ` Albrecht Dreß
2009-11-28 21:38               ` David Brownell
2009-11-28 21:59               ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:45       ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-17  8:27   ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:54     ` Bill Gatliff [this message]
2009-11-20 22:21     ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 14:13       ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-23 17:40         ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 15:29       ` Mark Brown
2009-11-23 17:44         ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 18:09           ` Mark Brown
2009-11-28 21:54             ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:39   ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-20 22:49     ` Grant Likely
2009-11-28 21:28       ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B02C726.6070607@billgatliff.com \
    --to=bgat@billgatliff.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).