From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] selftest: size: Add size test for Linux kernel Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:50:11 -0700 Message-ID: <547FAFC3.40609@osg.samsung.com> References: <547F598D.7030205@sonymobile.com> <20141204003653.GA5004@thin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141204003653.GA5004@thin> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Josh Triplett , Tim Bird Cc: "linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Thomas Petazzoni , Michael Ellerman , "linux-embedded-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Shuah Khan On 12/03/2014 05:36 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:21AM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: >> This test shows the amount of memory used by the system. >> Note that this is dependent on the user-space that is loaded >> when this program runs. Optimally, this program would be >> run as the init program itself. >> >> The program is optimized for size itself, to avoid conflating >> its own execution with that of the system software. >> The code is compiled statically, with no stdlibs. On my x86_64 system, >> this results in a statically linked binary of less than 5K. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tim Bird > > v6 looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett > > Should this go through the tinification tree or the selftests tree? > Josh/Tim, Thanks both. Yes v6 looks good. I will take this through kselftest tree. I will apply this to kselftes fixes. -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org | (970) 217-8978