From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fundu Subject: Re: local_save_flags(flags) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <77566.7174.qm@web63401.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <8bd0f97a0809231831r6bc6d8c2o6189bedc8d7da89e@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: fundu_1999@yahoo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0809231831r6bc6d8c2o6189bedc8d7da89e@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mike Frysinger Cc: linux embedded > >>> what about Non maskable interrupts ? disabling > >>> interrupt won't have any effect on that > right ? > >> > >> that really doesnt make sense by definition huh. > >> non-maskable means > >> they cant be masked. > > > > yeah thats the point. i should have elaborated more. > > then there's no guarantee that your code wont be > interrupted ? > > design your system properly and it wont be an issue could you elaborate more on this, as to what you mean by good design in this context. > you about the Blackfin processor, but i doubt you're > using that. sure i would like to know. i also have a 537 which i would work on for the next project and don't mind more info on it. thanks! Fundu