From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alex Riesen" Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:29:22 +0200 Message-ID: <81b0412b0810211529x3fc85567yc34fd369ff7c8518@mail.gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=zKRrRnLQXXEPy/MWZg6S3+dSj7dmxXCvXHJe26FSdoM=; b=Sg565YZmwet0DOEgqP94GaiFsYVFcZ52iYxRWm6m0yHwHCqBs5I00uSnW4CLGaD3pn kc6B3fk6Ki/KoX4Vg8e2C5m+jfopiHvxMBcfT6wt/87QcJd9iqSPPOPpZ1LIFnKLf5ud eKGSkTLsApmM9O3K1EMNPQpPptgw/8JQNL6a0= In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Phillip Lougher Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com 2008/10/17 Phillip Lougher : > There are 16 patches in the patch set, and the patches are against the > latest linux-next tree (linux 2.6.27-next-20081016). You better don't base anything off linux-next. These are not stable: there can be even something in the tree you mentioned which will never end up in the mainline and if your patches depend on it they wont apply to something like v2.6.26.2. Use something tagged (v2.6.27, v2.6.27-rc*) in _mainline_ instead. Than it can be applied to anything from stable releases to vendor trees (which mostly are based off mainline).