From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mike Frysinger" Subject: Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:11:57 -0400 Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0809221511v1aba47eemb1630f7e64412e4@mail.gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LlkzxVh1T2Eka66foiIr7azFiKS4hUbgzSctmO3uoTw=; b=VhYsfEdpLTF4Zo9JIDewOVs+IJD7uhrKHz6+e16ZpFBqM0Ea4sV+em5cZJaLzM6xLB Lmt8MRjFMoOr+NMkyOAk9cFECF7ndZy3kxM9a0DuplcSssZtEOKlWPaIfVwwRs+c/O/d l+5PiD3K4EV0fLjG4R6F6EiszxImuDVZNsXQs= In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Grant Likely Cc: Jeremy Kerr , linuxppc-dev , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 18:08, Grant Likely wrote: > Jeremy, > > Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with > linuxppc-dev? I don't think we need two separate lists anymore and > patches to linuxppc-embedded don't always get dealt with. > > Anyone have any objections to eliminating linuxppc-embedded? you sent this e-mail to "linux-embedded" instead of "linuxppc-embedded" -mike