From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
To: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
Cc: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] [PWM] Generic PWM API implementation
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:51:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0811041251x322acbafhbd7a3cc3bc2436a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4910AD88.2000200@billgatliff.com>
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 15:16, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 14:14, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>>> +int pwm_register(struct pwm_device *pwm)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pwm_channel *p;
>>> + int wchan;
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>
>> the initialization to 0 here isnt needed
>
> This is literally the only feedback I have received. I take that to mean that
> the code basically works as advertised, and nobody else has any problems with it
> (it continues to work fine for me here).
>
> So, what's the next step? How do I advocate for getting this API into mainline?
you looking to be maintainer ? if so, i imagine you start a git tree
(on kernel.org?) for people to pull from, post patches to mainline now
and indicate you'd ask for a 2.6.29 merge ...
-mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-15 18:14 [PATCH 0/6] Generic PWM API implementation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] [PWM] " Bill Gatliff
2008-10-17 15:59 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-04 20:16 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-11-04 20:51 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2008-11-04 23:55 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 0:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-05 2:59 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-11-05 5:08 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 2:56 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] [PWM] Changes to existing include/linux/pwm.h to adapt to generic PWM API Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] [PWM] Documentation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] [PWM] Driver for Atmel PWMC peripheral Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] [PWM] Install new Atmel PWMC driver in Kconfig, expunge old one Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] [PWM] New LED driver and trigger that use PWM API Bill Gatliff
2009-11-13 19:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] Generic PWM API implementation Grant Likely
2009-11-14 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-11-14 7:55 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-17 7:47 ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:48 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-17 16:53 ` David Brownell
2009-11-20 22:51 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-20 22:14 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 14:12 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-23 17:39 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 20:51 ` Albrecht Dreß
2009-11-28 21:38 ` David Brownell
2009-11-28 21:59 ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:45 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-17 8:27 ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:54 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-20 22:21 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 14:13 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-23 17:40 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 15:29 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-23 17:44 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 18:09 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-28 21:54 ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:39 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-20 22:49 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-28 21:28 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bd0f97a0811041251x322acbafhbd7a3cc3bc2436a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).