From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phylib: make mdio-gpio work without OF (v2)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 00:34:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0811042134n3c5543bbwed7a8ebfd0e3f77e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811042045.41052.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 23:45, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > That's generally the preferred way to handle #ifdeffery.
>> > But I could imagine OF isn't (yet?) set up to handle it.
>>
>> i agree completely with the inclination to do it all in C as you've
>> suggested and let the compiler do dead code elimination, but that only
>> works if the functions in question are defined everywhere (in other
>> words, there's a linux/ api for it). i dont think that's the case for
>> OF (which is what you were implying?) ...
>
> Only works if the functions are "declared" everywhere;
> the stuff that's included in header files.
>
> A "definition" would be available at link time (except
> for inlined functions, in headers). Actual C functions.
>
> If indeed OF functions don't have declarations which are
> available on all platforms, that might be worth fixing
> to enable this approach to #ifdef elimination.
OF is open firmware right ? no way there's going to be OF for every
port that supports GPIO, so filling out the stubs in linux/of_gpio.h
will need to be done.
-mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-04 14:45 [PATCH] phylib: make mdio-gpio work without OF (v2) Paulius Zaleckas
2008-11-04 15:45 ` Marc Pignat
2008-11-04 15:57 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-04 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-05 0:04 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 0:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-05 4:45 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 5:34 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2008-11-05 8:11 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 8:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-05 8:57 ` Marc Pignat
2008-11-05 23:03 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 8:57 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2008-11-05 9:04 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2008-11-05 15:04 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-05 22:59 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bd0f97a0811042134n3c5543bbwed7a8ebfd0e3f77e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).