linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Amol Lad" <amol.lad@gmail.com>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
Cc: linux-embedded <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:08:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c675e9b0806180538m1dc594b3h1db104ed1afaf65d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48580116.9070504@am.sony.com>

>
> I am working with a product team on bootup time issues.  One technique
> that we are forward-porting from an old kernel (and that I thought I
> might work on mainlining) is to compile modules statically into the kernel,
> but defer their initialization until after boot time.


I landed in same problem sometime back with USB and tried two approaches

1. Dirty approach of deferring loading of all usb modules till you see
application startup "from user point of view" is done. I then just
call into a script which loads all the usb modules "in parallel" with
rest of app initialization

2. The usb modules that I load are usbcore, host controller driver,
scsi_mod, sd_mod and usb_storage. I noted that it's actually scsi
enumeration that takes a long time; usb enumeration was much faster. I
compiled usbcore and host controller driver statically in the kernel,
enabled CONFIG_HOTPLUG and did rest of the module loading in a script
invoked from /sbin/hotplug.

Amol

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-18 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-17 18:23 Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel Tim Bird
2008-06-17 18:51 ` David VomLehn
2008-06-17 19:07 ` Jörn Engel
2008-06-17 19:22   ` Jim Freeman
2008-06-17 20:06     ` Tim Bird
2008-06-17 19:52   ` Tim Bird
2008-06-17 19:55     ` Tim Bird
2008-06-17 20:23       ` Jörn Engel
2008-06-17 20:35         ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-17 22:48           ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-18  0:03             ` Johannes Stezenbach
2008-06-18  0:10               ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-18  9:38                 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2008-06-17 20:19     ` Jörn Engel
2008-06-18 12:38 ` Amol Lad [this message]
     [not found] ` <4858A659.8030502@codefidence.com>
2008-06-18 16:08   ` Tim Bird
     [not found]     ` <4859ECF3.3000500@codefidence.com>
2008-06-19 17:58       ` Tim Bird
2008-06-22  7:08         ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2008-06-23 17:40           ` Tim Bird
2008-07-01 14:20             ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-18  6:47 Gilad Ben-Yossef
2008-06-18  8:20 ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18  8:32   ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18  8:52   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-18  8:57     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-18  9:59       ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18 10:33         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-18 10:41           ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18 11:37           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-18 14:56             ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c675e9b0806180538m1dc594b3h1db104ed1afaf65d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=amol.lad@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).