From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Amol Lad" Subject: Re: kernel command line from u-boot Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:57:30 +0530 Message-ID: <8c675e9b0808070427v42a4055bwae3adfb160a4e1ab@mail.gmail.com> References: <8c675e9b0808062141s74f1a7bfob5cab6b23b0268d3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=+uemJn0vBcR1HCPtcfaTb1TA6j/hdI6n2eQRJN7jm24=; b=GclTqy5vUt8zLUQCMN+WPA1E9okb5Lx21RoCocjHSRvc8ghF92J4Pkc8kkPjrTqjN3 +ovv1dn5JXsvRxZgHPQU2yUkH7a1J34MKclpx6yfinKZnkUaUqaAI7W67rWShHnGhCWf QxMlXT1tqKeZ/KKRPeG9PCk+PTkpVYeDNbCGA= In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Geert Uytterhoeven > Probably nobody noticed as this part of the code takes care of the > `obsolete-style' parameters. `module_param' is the new way. Ohh, btw how module_param is different from obsolete style paramaters ? Do we need to pass arguments to kernel from bootloader using a different method for getting them processed using module_param ? > > Geert Uytterhoeven Thanks Amol