From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: [PWM v6 0/3] Implement a generic PWM framework Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:48:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1298259345-9794-1-git-send-email-bgat@billgatliff.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+wL8l4hc/Xyuy/fo46TzLXbA7y5kgHV3sXwLCsX/xmI=; b=gtrHpr1FkhI7idF4AA1TmiX5TJFS+uxFFL+9wzUVweby7fdv8xbCEdAzphGtXpt2D9 tiI2gKf9Cpy8c0rxTeWOzwUkDh8LdkeRDIMTlMrri9zJVtW1TLqhT+0nkyLtC8z6fraO hcH27KgmMWGLXw4p4No5oNj1zQ8PNNYlwDAFo= In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: Bill Gatliff Cc: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 21:38, Bill Gatliff wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Bill Gatliff wrote: >> This patch series contains the sixth attempt at implementation of >> a generic PWM device interface framework. =C2=A0Think gpiolib, but f= or >> devices and pseudo-devices that generate pulse-wave-modulated output= s. > > Hearing no objections, does this mean that this code is finally ready > for a pull request? =C2=A0To whom do I send it? i'd start with akpm/lkml/linus and add yourself to MAINTAINERS for the pwm framework -mike