From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH] (updated, rolled up) make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:17:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <200807172213.37411.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200807172213.37411.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, x86@kernel.org, James Bottomley , Russell King , David Howells , Ralf Baechle , Lennert Buytenhek , Josh Boyer , Paul Mackerras , David Woodhouse , Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds , Paul Gortmaker , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Development , Tim Bird , Martin Schwidefsky , Dave Miller On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Here is the update against current Linus tree, > rolled up into one patch. > > James Bottomley suggested a different naming scheme: > instead of swapping parts (.text.head -> .head.text), > prepend .kernel to our special section names. > This patch implements his idea. Why not '.linux'? > ppc and v850 are dropped per comments from arch people. > parisc and x86 had minor fixes. x86 fix added proper > executable bits to a section: > > -.section ".text.head" > +.section ".kernel.text.head","ax",@progbits > > Does arch/m68k/kernel/sun3-head.S need the same fix? Sure, why not? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds