From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Remove Matt Mackall as his identity is obsolete Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:47:04 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20210920080635.253826-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <57122a67509bebdf0d1b9f5bc15db116e0124e5d.camel@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1634636843; bh=9WpIKSjpHCw/alwPbMvvbFk/40a6krbHuMfWKlR1GB0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SmesInog4R8l0uM1cVLwfoG/7ocuW2JwahC8DYBA7HH60IdBVEtNvkq/kuazDMg4L hS3w2xlaBDCwaOJi5dMyu70ZM3SIxH2EaSCOzuHB616tNKejlKDBNCUtpdrb9U7uxS BJK/rJwy+JRKA0xMMuYyH8n42vN8Q40VTViflhA4= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57122a67509bebdf0d1b9f5bc15db116e0124e5d.camel@infradead.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: David Woodhouse Cc: Tim Bird , Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Gortmaker , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Matt Porter , Kevin Hilman , Thomas Gleixner , thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Tim Bird On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:33:10AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 09:55 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Tim, > >=20 > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:17:22PM -0600, Tim Bird wrote: > > > I think an overhaul of the "EMBEDDED LINUX" MAINTAINERS entry > > > is long-overdue. > > >=20 > > > No offense to any of the 3 persons listed, but I think the kernel dev= eloper > > > community would be better served by a group of individuals with a more > > > current active role in embedded linux. I have a few names I'll > > > toss out for > > > candidates: Matt Porter, Kevin Hilman, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas > > > Petazonni, Laurent Pinchart, and Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig (and maybe even > > > myself). > > >=20 > > > This entry in the MAINTAINERS file is somewhat special, in that it > > > covers a "field of endeavor" rather than a specific set of files or > > > directories. > > >=20 > > > Thoughts? > >=20 > > Thank you for volunteering me :-) > >=20 > > I was indeed wondering about this particular MAINTAINERS entry. As it > > doesn't cover any particular set of files, directories, drivers, > > subsystems or architectures, what does being listed here endeavour ? >=20 > Basically nothing; I was going to suggest removing it entirely. There's > certainly no point listing me there any more. >=20 > Once upon a time it involved a certain amount of heckling about memory > usage and "your hash table doesn't need to be that large" but that ship > sailed a long time ago :) Heckling is still an option without a MAINTAINERS entry I suppose :-) I wouldn't object if we were to remove it. --=20 Regards, Laurent Pinchart