linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raffaele Recalcati <lamiaposta71@gmail.com>
To: CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@tree.celinuxforum.org>,
	linux-embedded <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>,
	elc10@tree.celinuxforum.org
Subject: CELF Project Proposal - Feasibility analisys of Android introduction  in a completely tested industrial device
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:14:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ade1bdc0912180814m7fd3c02cp7d99a1943c2da37e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Summary: Feasibility analisys of Android introduction in a completely
tested industrial device.

Description: By now Android has been ported to 600Mhz Cortex A8 cpu or similar.
The declared Android requirements are instead lower, about 200Mhz Arm9
cpu with 100Mhz Ram bus.
So I think the growing interest in this O.S. lacks some porting to
less powerful cpus.
The reasons to do this porting are commercial because of Google market
power, but are also technnical, because Android debugging environment
is very nice for not embedded developers.
This could help the diffusion of opensource embedded Linux.

The porting will be maybe against the 2.6.31 kernel for pxa270.
The idea is to preserve industrial tested development but adding
Android graphical interface.

The cpu dependency of the porting will be as small as possible.

Related work:
 * Android Porting - http://www.kandroid.org/<wbr></wbr>android_pdk/
 * Android Pxa270 - http://android-pxa270.sourceforge.net/

Scope:
This should take more than 1 month for feasibility analysis.


-- 
www.opensurf.it

             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-18 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-18 16:14 Raffaele Recalcati [this message]
2009-12-19 15:46 ` CELF Project Proposal - Feasibility analisys of Android introduction in a completely tested industrial device Raffaele Recalcati
2009-12-21  9:55   ` alucero
2009-12-22  1:46   ` Tim Bird
2009-12-28 16:26     ` Raffaele Recalcati

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ade1bdc0912180814m7fd3c02cp7d99a1943c2da37e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lamiaposta71@gmail.com \
    --cc=celinux-dev@tree.celinuxforum.org \
    --cc=elc10@tree.celinuxforum.org \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).