From: Raffaele Recalcati <lamiaposta71@gmail.com>
To: CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@tree.celinuxforum.org>,
linux-embedded <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>,
elc10@tree.celinuxforum.org
Subject: Re: CELF Project Proposal - Feasibility analisys of Android introduction in a completely tested industrial device
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:46:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ade1bdc0912190746h320ef36fpc01f3976d78aae65@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ade1bdc0912180814m7fd3c02cp7d99a1943c2da37e@mail.gmail.com>
2009/12/18 Raffaele Recalcati <lamiaposta71@gmail.com>:
> Summary: Feasibility analisys of Android introduction in a completely
> tested industrial device.
>
> Description: By now Android has been ported to 600Mhz Cortex A8 cpu or similar.
> The declared Android requirements are instead lower, about 200Mhz Arm9
> cpu with 100Mhz Ram bus.
> So I think the growing interest in this O.S. lacks some porting to
> less powerful cpus.
> The reasons to do this porting are commercial because of Google market
> power, but are also technnical, because Android debugging environment
> is very nice for not embedded developers.
> This could help the diffusion of opensource embedded Linux.
>
> The porting will be maybe against the 2.6.31 kernel for pxa270.
> The idea is to preserve industrial tested development but adding
> Android graphical interface.
>
> The cpu dependency of the porting will be as small as possible.
>
> Related work:
> * Android Porting - http://www.kandroid.org/<wbr></wbr>android_pdk/
> * Android Pxa270 - http://android-pxa270.sourceforge.net/
>
> Scope:
> This should take more than 1 month for feasibility analysis.
>
>
> --
Anybody can give me his idea about this proposal?
Thx
Bye,
Recalcati
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-19 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 16:14 CELF Project Proposal - Feasibility analisys of Android introduction in a completely tested industrial device Raffaele Recalcati
2009-12-19 15:46 ` Raffaele Recalcati [this message]
2009-12-21 9:55 ` alucero
2009-12-22 1:46 ` Tim Bird
2009-12-28 16:26 ` Raffaele Recalcati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ade1bdc0912190746h320ef36fpc01f3976d78aae65@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lamiaposta71@gmail.com \
--cc=celinux-dev@tree.celinuxforum.org \
--cc=elc10@tree.celinuxforum.org \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).