From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <48B313E0.1000501@hp.com> <200808261111.19205.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20080826183051.GB10925@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20080826205916.GB11734@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20080826232411.GC11734@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20080827002316.GE11734@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080827002316.GE11734@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Rusty Russell , "Alan D. Brunelle" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > When did we get callpaths like like nfs+xfs+md+scsi reliably > working with 4kB stacks on x86-32? XFS may never have been usable, but the rest, sure. And you seem to be making this whole argument an excuse to SUCK, adn an excuse to let gcc crap even more on our stack space. Why? Why aren't you saying that we should be able to do better? Instead, you seem to asking us to do even worse than we do now? Linus