From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Leon Woestenberg" Subject: Re: is it worth separating initrd from initramfs support? Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:16:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=waxXbOzkdRZEQjgbp36BRQzMrZNqi3rLKqZ8hOcAYV4=; b=KyJb6RBLfLQL9QwYzAzgY9AqdCLHrV9YuJ3kffP0euPsP5MUxj+LiCo8aDepRaRTVd LDiVOt0+Mx5z2T2fNLUbDqPnGSquKM0yHAtkEzxxnO5KFRyNLH75vREHTUEjCjsBiKAF LcPl3g2KeFlOymbpw+M/sT71nGDpno/NIFrPE= In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Embedded Linux mailing list Robert, On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > not sure if i asked this here once upon a time but, in the current > kernel, you get to select support for *both* initrd and initramfs with > a single selection (CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD). > > ... > > in the context of embedded linux, is there any value in separating > these features and letting one select them individually? isn't it > Makes sense to me to seperate them, especially if this reduces code size. Small kernels and initramfs's are used in memory constrained systems, we run it on FPGA SoC cores. Does disabling initrd alone reduce code size? Is the dependency on some subsystem removed (block i/o layer?) Regards, -- Leon