From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: Representing Embedded Architectures at the Kernel Summit Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:46:11 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1243956140.4229.25.camel@mulgrave.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20090602174538.GA10973@cuplxvomd02.corp.sa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090602174538.GA10973@cuplxvomd02.corp.sa.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: David VomLehn Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit-2009-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, Josh Boyer , Tim Bird On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:45 AM, David VomLehn wrote: > Should we decide to go this way, there probably a next step wherein we > standardize the device tree entries for those devices that are shared across > multiple architectures and platorms. This will likely be a never-ending > and mostly thankless task, but will again make things easier in the long run. devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org mailing list is your friend here. In PowerPC land we've mostly settled on the policy of not merging a driver before the device tree binding is documented, posted and reviewed. This weeds out a lot of common mistakes. I also think the stuff in Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings needs to be moved out to a common location. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.