From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: Representing Embedded Architectures at the Kernel Summit Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:48:39 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1243956140.4229.25.camel@mulgrave.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20090602172941.GL3095@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org> <20090602222132.GK6399@game.jcrosoft.org> <1B5FD82F-79A5-4FD1-BA99-59F3041B0470@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1B5FD82F-79A5-4FD1-BA99-59F3041B0470@kernel.crashing.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Kumar Gala Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Josh Boyer , James Bottomley , ksummit-2009-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > >> I'd like to propose AMP and kernel relocate >> as more and SoC will came with multiple core with or without the same arch > > I think AMP or at least the idea of the kernel communicating with other OSes > on the same SoC in multi-core systems is interesting. Indeed, and not just for SoCs. I'm currently looking at Ira's adaptation of virtio to use it for IPC between two separate CPUs running separate Linux instances and connected via PCI. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.