From: Yue Hu <zbestahu@gmail.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Cc: xiang@kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, huyue2@yulong.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AOSP: erofs-utils: fix sub directory prefix path in canned fs_config
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:46:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201222174623.00005f9b.zbestahu@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201222093952.GC1819755@xiangao.remote.csb>
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:39:52 +0800
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 05:30:14PM +0800, Yue Hu wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > + else if (asprintf(&fspath, "%s/%s", cfg.mount_point,
> > > > > + erofs_fspath(path)) <= 0)
> > > >
> > > > The argument of path will be root directory. And canned fs_config for root directory as
> > > > below:
> > > >
> > > > 0 0 755 selabel=u:object_r:rootfs:s0 capabilities=0x0
> > > >
> > > > So, cannot add mount point to root directory for canned fs_config. And what about non-canned
> > > > fs_config?
> > >
> > > Not quite sure what you mean. For non-canned fs_config, we didn't observed any strange
> > > before (I ported to cuttlefish and hikey960 with boot success, also as I mentioned before
> > > some other vendors already use it.)
> > >
> > > I think the following commit is only useful for squashfs since its (non)root inode
> > > workflows are different, so need to add in two difference place. But mkfs.erofs is not.
> > > https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/squashfs-tools/+/85a6bc1e52bb911f195c5dc0890717913938c2d1%5E%21/#F0
> > >
> > > For root inode is erofs, I think erofs_fspath(path) would return "", so that case
> > > is included as well.... Am I missing something?
> >
> > Yes, erofs_fspath(path) returns "" for root inode. However, the above patch add the mount
> > point to fspath when specify it, so the real path is "vendor/" which does not exist in canned
> > fs_config file. build will report below error:
> >
> > failed to find [/vendor/] in canned fs_config
>
> Hmmm... such design is quite strange for me....
:) i checked the squashfs before, seems root directory is handled in some position. Separated
with sub directory fs_config. so i add the goto code in the 1st patch.
> Could you try the following diff?
Let's me verify.
>
> diff --git a/lib/inode.c b/lib/inode.c
> index 9469074..9af6179 100644
> --- a/lib/inode.c
> +++ b/lib/inode.c
> @@ -698,11 +698,14 @@ int erofs_droid_inode_fsconfig(struct erofs_inode *inode,
> /* filesystem_config does not preserve file type bits */
> mode_t stat_file_type_mask = st->st_mode & S_IFMT;
> unsigned int uid = 0, gid = 0, mode = 0;
> + bool alloced;
> char *fspath;
>
> inode->capabilities = 0;
> - if (!cfg.mount_point)
> - fspath = erofs_fspath(path);
> +
> + alloced = (cfg.mount_point && erofs_fspath(path)[0] != '\0');
> + if (!alloced)
> + fspath = (char *)erofs_fspath(path);
> else if (asprintf(&fspath, "%s/%s", cfg.mount_point,
> erofs_fspath(path)) <= 0)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -718,7 +721,7 @@ int erofs_droid_inode_fsconfig(struct erofs_inode *inode,
> cfg.target_out_path,
> &uid, &gid, &mode, &inode->capabilities);
>
> - if (cfg.mount_point)
> + if (alloced)
> free(fspath);
> st->st_uid = uid;
> st->st_gid = gid;
>
> if it works, will redo a formal patch then....
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gao Xiang
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thx.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +
> > > > > if (cfg.fs_config_file)
> > > > > - canned_fs_config(erofs_fspath(path),
> > > > > + canned_fs_config(fspath,
> > > > > S_ISDIR(st->st_mode),
> > > > > cfg.target_out_path,
> > > > > &uid, &gid, &mode, &inode->capabilities);
> > > > > - else if (cfg.mount_point) {
> > > > > - if (asprintf(&fspath, "%s/%s", cfg.mount_point,
> > > > > - erofs_fspath(path)) <= 0)
> > > > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > -
> > > > > + else
> > > > > fs_config(fspath, S_ISDIR(st->st_mode),
> > > > > cfg.target_out_path,
> > > > > &uid, &gid, &mode, &inode->capabilities);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (cfg.mount_point)
> > > > > free(fspath);
> > > > > - }
> > > > > st->st_uid = uid;
> > > > > st->st_gid = gid;
> > > > > st->st_mode = mode | stat_file_type_mask;
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-22 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-22 2:04 [PATCH] AOSP: erofs-utils: fix sub directory prefix path in canned fs_config Yue Hu
2020-12-22 3:44 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-22 4:47 ` Yue Hu
2020-12-22 6:31 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-22 7:04 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-22 7:12 ` Yue Hu
2020-12-22 8:10 ` Yue Hu
2020-12-22 9:13 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-22 9:27 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-22 9:30 ` Yue Hu
2020-12-22 9:39 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-22 9:46 ` Yue Hu [this message]
2020-12-22 9:59 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-22 10:17 ` Yue Hu
2020-12-22 10:33 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-22 11:07 ` Yue Hu
2020-12-22 10:34 ` Yue Hu
2020-12-22 10:47 ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-24 3:45 ` Yue Hu
2020-12-24 4:19 ` Gao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201222174623.00005f9b.zbestahu@gmail.com \
--to=zbestahu@gmail.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
--cc=huyue2@yulong.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox