From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E08C433F5 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 03:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HzQqT0T9qz2yw9 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:05:25 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=NRaLXp2D; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=djwong@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=NRaLXp2D; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HzQqM4Fc7z2yPT for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:05:19 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3682660F55; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 03:05:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1637723116; bh=8E5AHzN+aCpIUyy/IKItQsgBCFz9QjxdNsnf6Wc8sLI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NRaLXp2DQNpRDi5NBlLIrHYp1YQ84fyWovscy9PbvHAt/ymlk5DiV6yDdEv5cQWZr jLpg2wIKqTZyI1ywqwak+JmUmQSdDiGbC/0EDBVNmzr8LgDHb5y1ocPXF2R6jYxhnN GN5ZvGVK69U1jII2tRqWVd7zBvVEF9NGxPhMG0So+jx7Z6OnHCYoRXokbFrI/Qp6wI kbYSpUTNH7LbVZaurhYL8mcXBu98rgITDU24/fEvl1Doo9kGD/X0YwHhmZrb9tueYZ d/7VoK/rTTLlDbMhSGJNN93DH71+f/oSLnH2gBKrosvzkrffMmGkKX9KhJ/nEPm2kt Y0OPUm6XnKtFg== Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:05:15 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/29] xfs: move dax device handling into xfs_{alloc,free}_buftarg Message-ID: <20211124030515.GC266024@magnolia> References: <20211109083309.584081-1-hch@lst.de> <20211109083309.584081-22-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux NVDIMM , Mike Snitzer , linux-s390 , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-xfs , device-mapper development , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 , Ira Weiny , Christoph Hellwig Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:40:47PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:34 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > Hide the DAX device lookup from the xfs_super.c code. > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > > That's an interesting spelling of "Signed-off-by", but patch looks > good to me too. I would have expected a robot to complain about > missing sign-off? Nah, they only like to do that /after/ you've pushed a branch to kernel.org and emailed the lists about it. ;) --D > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams