From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D22E9C47DAF for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PC8LfRAM; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PC8LfRAM; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TJVDJ3MF8z3bqx for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:40:00 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PC8LfRAM; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PC8LfRAM; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.129.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=dhowells@redhat.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TJVCd3n2Pz3byl for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:39:25 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705927163; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2EbxtrFCFvcK5IiuVsAPW/KUPjjRaC8uqKzNdD5mRDM=; b=PC8LfRAM83QuBr0TM4n0+k1uOPBSljUtx9Rd/c0aKAt1YbnJIq0Ox8WzRqM/aMIJU+cNkL ql52tT4PaKpbD8bdAeUFNd5Ux6Nw122KgIX0DpueUCysd3LeyfOR4rHC1w00Kiz7n1t6pd dpGoIDFMwQ2R1CE2xRH1ZmwPuhtl2XI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705927163; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2EbxtrFCFvcK5IiuVsAPW/KUPjjRaC8uqKzNdD5mRDM=; b=PC8LfRAM83QuBr0TM4n0+k1uOPBSljUtx9Rd/c0aKAt1YbnJIq0Ox8WzRqM/aMIJU+cNkL ql52tT4PaKpbD8bdAeUFNd5Ux6Nw122KgIX0DpueUCysd3LeyfOR4rHC1w00Kiz7n1t6pd dpGoIDFMwQ2R1CE2xRH1ZmwPuhtl2XI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-515-cT5bUUrvOPuNd97vS-GVBg-1; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:39:19 -0500 X-MC-Unique: cT5bUUrvOPuNd97vS-GVBg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9CAD88D283; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.com (unknown [10.42.28.67]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E643B492BE2; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:39:16 +0000 (UTC) From: David Howells To: Christian Brauner Subject: [PATCH 10/10] afs: Fix missing/incorrect unlocking of RCU read lock Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:38:43 +0000 Message-ID: <20240122123845.3822570-11-dhowells@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240122123845.3822570-1-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20240122123845.3822570-1-dhowells@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, Jeff Layton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , David Howells , linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel test robot , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" In afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(), we need to unlock the RCU read lock in both places before returning (and not lock it again). Fixes: f94f70d39cc2 ("afs: Provide a way to configure address priorities") Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401172243.cd53d5f6-oliver.sang@intel.com Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org --- fs/afs/proc.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/afs/proc.c b/fs/afs/proc.c index 3bd02571f30d..15eab053af6d 100644 --- a/fs/afs/proc.c +++ b/fs/afs/proc.c @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) if (!preflist) { seq_puts(m, "NO PREFS\n"); - return 0; + goto out; } seq_printf(m, "PROT SUBNET PRIOR (v=%u n=%u/%u/%u)\n", @@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ static int afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) } } - rcu_read_lock(); +out: + rcu_read_unlock(); return 0; }