From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A3E1C61DD6 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 05:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hZWkZ1LjPz2xyl; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:39:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1788327558; cv=none; b=jDzUQpsa41qFMHZFwObLOmrzjNCl9o20anew51zNOQ37QxH4CGFFkmTcmY8tIDl2DVjFBvld63dPWcfIyLp3OitaVv0zLmBk4RGCr/2W01tXmCvED1o1CAXKaPGWMDrFuV+JXcpJ4BxNgnmz+OGSn1n+bhzi7UjMiUKJKNQYVKWjjQ4N6opYAPyei+LqZJm4/KJp8zitbgPpI3a+iURje6WeEzUt8tcytK9ZZAa9RNaR6k3JujFQyRyojw1CRXWDeT9SpRGvUZUkVdHHkyM8JIi4FKfayfJp2PVKXSG85MJYG7ppxJrYm4gov9KIkKo3EX7AFfM92OTvjbEBZI8oQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1788327558; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=CRkNX4cQTY5etRTJOCaqWjzWOoYLNAiVIcrIYTGECAQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Fu9QEu/0wqUaavot9D3Q7HLZ4yWVNNaUlym8Sl6d9LDGF1wAoY9wuwn2kZC4kSSe8aPf4t9KXP44Vy8ijIsFN2ItLhfq1i0W4Dcz2H60zn/IOf1IPFgIMaNiY4A+0nRlA4SGtXYmbcoE/lI/TR9bgVbQxk6Jy5hhhSjhaftA0ZcSWV4sHx3kXCay8KNj2M6cpjgUAZTSjPb8p6J5HIPnqKfUOra/rF5V1P4hOQQDJQNFkS4sypVDDCukcsNn7bpN+74vR1jIBLi3fKDneEAB5cJrIB9l8ukpLasAaHFtecP5It3ZyT3ohBIWDH6Wq90BIJHTamrX5zobHDjSfvaXng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) X-Greylist: delayed 460 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at boromir; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:39:17 AEST Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hZWkY0LvSz2xyh for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:39:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1BC8F68C4E; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 07:31:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 07:31:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Alexander Viro , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Gao Xiang , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 08/18] fs: add dedicated block device open helpers for filesystems Message-ID: <20260902053128.GA23581@lst.de> References: <20260616-work-super-bdev_holder_global-v2-0-7df6b864028e@kernel.org> <20260616-work-super-bdev_holder_global-v2-8-7df6b864028e@kernel.org> <20260901221314.GC6038@frogsfrogsfrogs> X-Mailing-List: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260901221314.GC6038@frogsfrogsfrogs> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 03:13:14PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hmm. I /think/ this might be causing regressions in xfs/006, > generic/311, and xfs/264 on XFS realtime filesystems. Each test fails > with a mount failure due to a busy device: Yes, I bisected thee failures to "xfs: port to fs_bdev_file_open_by_path()" as reported on Saturday. Besides the failures I also still have the same architectural objections to this whole series as before.