From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B588C433F5 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J9Skh4gjsz3c5l for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:06:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZI3eQsOB; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZI3eQsOB; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.133.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=dhowells@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZI3eQsOB; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZI3eQsOB; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J9Skd576zz2ypK for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:06:01 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1639134359; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uXmSWdAkzvhcbRft4KQZHSQCM8y6UG3Uqza0cNxYX6M=; b=ZI3eQsOB9oxIBcpI+I5AKEHHWe0ynmMSdNsaS73DEesJeEX3Sg2ydqqqOG5EmKrchrCc7u jDkMA9OztblQXjokT667rygtz/aniW4imjSjQPDxnxvlyhKFBhgsNedKJw9t38sTyCqpJv 4JCcY2X03DyJHi1tmlxB7mUhmby1H+U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1639134359; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uXmSWdAkzvhcbRft4KQZHSQCM8y6UG3Uqza0cNxYX6M=; b=ZI3eQsOB9oxIBcpI+I5AKEHHWe0ynmMSdNsaS73DEesJeEX3Sg2ydqqqOG5EmKrchrCc7u jDkMA9OztblQXjokT667rygtz/aniW4imjSjQPDxnxvlyhKFBhgsNedKJw9t38sTyCqpJv 4JCcY2X03DyJHi1tmlxB7mUhmby1H+U= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-556-RnfZ5k-OM0e9xHj1cxvcOA-1; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 06:05:53 -0500 X-MC-Unique: RnfZ5k-OM0e9xHj1cxvcOA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E67436393; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.33.36.122]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F88A60BE5; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20211210073619.21667-2-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20211210073619.21667-2-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> <20211210073619.21667-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> To: Jeffle Xu Subject: Re: [RFC 01/19] cachefiles: add mode command MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <269834.1639134342.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:05:42 +0000 Message-ID: <269835.1639134342@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tao.peng@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gerry@linux.alibaba.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, eguan@linux.alibaba.com Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" Jeffle Xu wrote: > +enum cachefiles_mode { > + CACHEFILES_MODE_CACHE, /* local cache for netfs (Default) */ > + CACHEFILES_MODE_DEMAND, /* demand read for read-only fs */ > +}; > + I would suggest just adding a flag for the moment. David