Linux-EROFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Nithurshen <nithurshen.dev@gmail.com>, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: xiang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] fsck.erofs: implement thread-safe global LRU metadata cache
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:15:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <423c662c-e8b4-4802-b7bf-34abd71a82ae@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611083601.81061-1-nithurshen.dev@gmail.com>



On 2026/6/11 16:36, Nithurshen wrote:
> This patch introduces a thread-safe metadata cache to reduce redundant
> I/O and decompression overhead during fsck extraction.
> 
> To ensure it remains highly concurrent for worker threads extracting
> pclusters, the cache utilizes a bucketed, rw-semaphore protected
> architecture modeled after the existing fragment cache.
> 
> Furthermore, to prevent out-of-memory (OOM) scenarios on exceptionally
> large EROFS images, the cache implements a strict Global Least Recently
> Used (LRU) eviction policy. The maximum cache size is dynamically
> configurable via the new '--cache-size' parameter, which defaults to a
> safe, fixed threshold of 32 MB.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nithurshen <nithurshen.dev@gmail.com>

why `malloc()` will prevent out-of-memory (OOM)?

First, either erofs_read_metadata_nid() or erofs_read_metadata_bdi()
will read file to the page cache; and currently there is no cache.


But you introduce another cache using malloc(), since it increases
the memory overhead, why it prevents out-of-memory (OOM)?

Thanks,
Gao Xiang


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11  8:36 [PATCH v1] fsck.erofs: implement thread-safe global LRU metadata cache Nithurshen
2026-06-11  9:15 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2026-06-13 10:10   ` Nithurshen
2026-06-15  1:48     ` Gao Xiang
2026-06-15  2:45       ` Nithurshen
2026-06-11 18:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Nithurshen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=423c662c-e8b4-4802-b7bf-34abd71a82ae@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nithurshen.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox