From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: richard@nod.at (Richard Weinberger)
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:00:28 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging
In-Reply-To: <20190818174621.GB12940@mit.edu>
References: <20190817082313.21040-1-hsiangkao@aol.com>
 <20190818084521.GA17909@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1>
 <1133002215.69049.1566119033047.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
 <20190818090949.GA30276@kroah.com>
 <790210571.69061.1566120073465.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
 <20190818151154.GA32157@mit.edu>
 <1897345637.69314.1566148000847.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
 <20190818174621.GB12940@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <538856932.69442.1566151228866.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>

----- Urspr?ngliche Mail -----
> Von: "tytso" <tytso at mit.edu>
> An: "richard" <richard at nod.at>
> CC: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>, "Gao Xiang" <hsiangkao at aol.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack at suse.cz>, "Chao
> Yu" <yuchao0 at huawei.com>, "Dave Chinner" <david at fromorbit.com>, "David Sterba" <dsterba at suse.cz>, "Miao Xie"
> <miaoxie at huawei.com>, "devel" <devel at driverdev.osuosl.org>, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr at canb.auug.org.au>, "Darrick"
> <darrick.wong at oracle.com>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch at infradead.org>, "Amir Goldstein" <amir73il at gmail.com>,
> "linux-erofs" <linux-erofs at lists.ozlabs.org>, "Al Viro" <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk>, "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk at kernel.org>,
> "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>, "Li Guifu" <bluce.liguifu at huawei.com>, "Fang Wei" <fangwei1 at huawei.com>,
> "Pavel Machek" <pavel at denx.de>, "linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel at vger.kernel.org>, "Andrew Morton"
> <akpm at linux-foundation.org>, "torvalds" <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. August 2019 19:46:21
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging

> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019@07:06:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> > So holding a file system like EROFS to a higher standard than say,
>> > ext4, xfs, or btrfs hardly seems fair.
>> 
>> Nobody claimed that.
> 
> Pointing out that erofs has issues in this area when Gao Xiang is
> asking if erofs can be moved out of staging and join the "official
> clubhouse" of file systems could certainly be reasonable interpreted
> as such.  Reporting such vulnerablities are a good thing, and
> hopefully all file system maintainers will welcome them.  Doing them
> on a e-mail thread about promoting out of erofs is certainly going to
> lead to inferences of a double standard.

Well, this was not at all my intention.
erofs raised my attention and instead of wasting a new thread
I answered here and reported what I found while looking at it.
That's all.

Thanks,
//richard