From: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
To: Martin Pitt <martin@piware.de>
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>,
Yifan Zhao <zhaoyifan28@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] erofs-utils: mkfs: emit an inode's xattrs in a canonical order
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 07:23:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anEi7yIiNTJ74jnv@XiangdeMacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anCBBdM7yw9Mm3xg@piware.de>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 01:52:37PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> listxattr(2) makes no promise about the order it reports, and
> filesystems disagree: tmpfs reports them in insertion order on recent
> kernels (or in a random order on older ones), while ext4 and btrfs
> report their own on-disk order.
>
> mkfs.erofs stored an inode's attributes in exactly the order it received
> them, so staging the same tree on different filesystems (or on older
> kernels merely twice in the same place) produced images that differed
> byte for byte. That made EROFS images unreproducible.
>
> Insert into the inode's list ordered by attribute name instead, and move
> inline attributes onto the on-stack list with list_add_tail() so the
> emitted order matches. The shared attribute pool already sorts by the
> same key, so generalize comp_shared_xattritem() into
> erofs_comp_xattritem() and use it for both.
>
> The length tiebreak previously returned only 0 or 1, never a negative
> value; make it a proper three-way comparison with cmpsgn().
>
> Suggested-by: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Pitt <martin@amutable.com>
Thanks, applied.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 11:52 [PATCH v2] erofs-utils: mkfs: emit an inode's xattrs in a canonical order Martin Pitt
2026-08-03 23:23 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anEi7yIiNTJ74jnv@XiangdeMacBook-Pro.local \
--to=xiang@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=martin@piware.de \
--cc=zhaoyifan28@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox