Linux-EROFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
	Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
	Yue Hu <zbestahu@gmail.com>,
	Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>,
	Hongbo Li <hongbohbli@tencent.com>,
	Chunhai Guo <guochunhai@vivo.com>,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 08/14] fs/erofs: use folio_attach/detach_private() instead of direct assignment
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 07:40:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anEnBSAOQE8LyKdI@XiangdeMacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-remove-pg_private-v1-8-142c97ba3562@nvidia.com>

Hi Zi,

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 10:13:31PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> erofs_onelinefolio_init/split/end() use folio->private without setting
> PG_private or increase folio refcount and it works. But after PG_private is
> replaced by checking folio->private in a future commit, it can break
> folio_expected_ref_count(), since the folio has private data without
> elevated refcount. Change it now.
> 
> It prepares for a future commit that removes PG_private.
> 
> No funtional change intended.
> 
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> To: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
> To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yue Hu <zbestahu@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>
> Cc: Hongbo Li <hongbohbli@tencent.com>
> Cc: Chunhai Guo <guochunhai@vivo.com>
> Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

It looks fine as long as PG_private flag will be removed in the
follow-up patches:

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-01  2:13 [PATCH RFC 00/14] Remove PG_private by using page/folio->private checks instead Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 07/14] fs/erofs: mm/pagemap: add readahead_folio_reverse() to avoid folio->private Zi Yan
2026-08-03  9:54   ` Jan Kara
2026-08-03 16:56     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-04  9:32       ` Jan Kara
2026-08-04 15:54         ` Zi Yan
2026-08-04 17:04           ` Jan Kara
2026-08-04 17:09             ` Zi Yan
2026-08-05  2:37               ` Zi Yan
2026-08-05  9:25               ` Jan Kara
2026-08-05 11:42                 ` Zi Yan
2026-08-05 13:51                   ` Zi Yan
2026-08-05 16:10                   ` Jan Kara
2026-08-03 23:55   ` Gao Xiang
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 08/14] fs/erofs: use folio_attach/detach_private() instead of direct assignment Zi Yan
2026-08-03 23:40   ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2026-08-05  2:41     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-05  4:17       ` Gao Xiang
2026-08-03  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 00/14] Remove PG_private by using page/folio->private checks instead Jürgen Groß
2026-08-03 18:13   ` Zi Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anEnBSAOQE8LyKdI@XiangdeMacBook-Pro.local \
    --to=xiang@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=dhavale@google.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=guochunhai@vivo.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hongbohbli@tencent.com \
    --cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zbestahu@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox