Linux-EROFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
To: Chris Ayoub <cayoub@openai.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebuild: prevent quadratic snapshot merges on wide directories
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:18:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ankY5UFLlWbKkNyd@XiangdeMacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809-rebuild-wide-directory-index-v1-1-ac8b7bce3edd@openai.com>

Hi Chris,

On Sun, Aug 09, 2026 at 05:44:08PM -0400, Chris Ayoub wrote:
> Directory entry merging currently performs a linear search of the
> destination directory for each source entry. Repeating this operation
> for wide directories makes snapshot rebuilding quadratic.
> 
> Add a temporary hashmap keyed by the parent inode and entry name during
> rebuild. Use the index to find existing children while preserving the
> existing merge and replacement behavior, and release it when rebuilding
> finishes.
> 
> In the original reproducer, merging 129 layers containing approximately
> 2.4 million entries did not finish after 1195 seconds. With the index,
> the same merge completed in 1.40 seconds. The widest directories
> contained 65,212 and 83,318 entries.
> 
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5
> Signed-off-by: Chris Ayoub <cayoub@openai.com>
> ---
> Snapshot rebuild currently performs a linear directory search for every
> entry being merged.  This becomes prohibitively expensive for container
> images with very wide directories.
> 
> The patch adds a temporary rebuild-only hashmap keyed by parent inode and
> entry name.  It preserves the existing merge and replacement behavior and
> releases the index after all source trees have been loaded.
> 
> The original workload merged 129 layers containing approximately 2.4
> million entries.  The unmodified rebuild did not finish after 1195 seconds;
> with the index, it completed in 1.40 seconds.  The widest directories had
> 65,212 and 83,318 entries.
> 
> Validation against current dev (v1.9.3) on arm64 Ubuntu 24.04:
> 
> - Full build with LZ4, LZMA, FUSE, and Zstd enabled
> - make check
> - Byte-identical output versus unmodified v1.9.3 for file replacement,
>   whiteout and opaque-directory handling, and an 8,000-entry directory
> - Extracted-tree checks for replacement, whiteout, and opaque semantics
> - 8,000-entry local rebuild: 0.23 seconds before, 0.01 seconds after

Yes, it's a known issue, but could you avoid using `hashmap` in
erofs-utils (we could just use `struct list_head hash[xxx] instead.`).

I'd like to get rid of `hashmap` since it's out of git codebase and
the license is GPL only.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang


      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-09 21:44 [PATCH] rebuild: prevent quadratic snapshot merges on wide directories Chris Ayoub via B4 Relay
2026-08-10  0:18 ` Gao Xiang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ankY5UFLlWbKkNyd@XiangdeMacBook-Pro.local \
    --to=xiang@kernel.org \
    --cc=cayoub@openai.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox