Re: [PATCH v2 39/92] erofs: convert to ctime accessor functions

[Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 2023-07-06 at 13:00 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 05-07-23 15:01:04, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is
> > used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
> > inode->i_ctime.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> 
> Just one nit below:
> 
> > @@ -176,10 +175,10 @@ static void *erofs_read_inode(struct erofs_buf *buf,
> >  		vi->chunkbits = sb->s_blocksize_bits +
> >  			(vi->chunkformat & EROFS_CHUNK_FORMAT_BLKBITS_MASK);
> >  	}
> > -	inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = inode->i_ctime.tv_sec;
> > -	inode->i_atime.tv_sec = inode->i_ctime.tv_sec;
> > -	inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec;
> > -	inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec;
> > +	inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_sec;
> > +	inode->i_atime.tv_sec = inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_sec;
> > +	inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_nsec;
> > +	inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_nsec;
> 
> Isn't this just longer way to write:
> 
> 	inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode_get_ctime(inode);
> 
> ?
> 
> 								Honza

Yes. Chalk that one up to coccinelle. Fixed in my tree.
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>