public inbox for linux-erofs@ozlabs.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: puneeth_aditya_5656 <myakampuneeth@gmail.com>,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] erofs-utils: lib: fix 48bit addressing detection for chunk-based format
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 01:44:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6abf29f-db3f-40f0-8504-0c987db0ebcd@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260224163749.32581-1-myakampuneeth@gmail.com>



On 2026/2/25 00:37, puneeth_aditya_5656 wrote:
> The 48-bit chunk format flag was being set inside
> erofs_blob_write_chunked_file right after erofs_blob_getchunk returns.
> At that point chunk->blkaddr is the chunk's offset in the temporary
> blob buffer, not the final image address. The real address is only
> known after erofs_mkfs_dump_blobs applies remapped_base.
> 
> This means the detection was unreliable in both directions: a chunk
> whose blob offset looks large but fits in 32-bits after remapping gets
> flagged unnecessarily, and worse, a chunk that lands above UINT32_MAX
> after remapping may not get flagged at all, producing a corrupt image.
> 
> Fix this by introducing erofs_inode_fixup_chunkformat() which walks
> the chunk array after remapped_base is finalized and sets the 48-bit
> flag if any chunk address exceeds UINT32_MAX. The fixup is called from
> erofs_bh_flush_write_inode before erofs_iflush so that the correct
> chunkformat is written into the on-disk inode header. Both blob chunks
> (remapped_base + chunk->blkaddr) and device chunks (chunk->blkaddr
> directly) are handled.

Closes: https://github.com/erofs/erofs-utils/issues/39

Also, a proper Signed-off-by: is needed.

> ---
>   include/erofs/blobchunk.h |  1 +
>   lib/blobchunk.c           | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   lib/inode.c               |  3 +++
>   3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/erofs/blobchunk.h b/include/erofs/blobchunk.h
> index ef06773..48fca63 100644
> --- a/include/erofs/blobchunk.h
> +++ b/include/erofs/blobchunk.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern "C"
>   
>   struct erofs_blobchunk *erofs_get_unhashed_chunk(unsigned int device_id,
>   		erofs_blk_t blkaddr, erofs_off_t sourceoffset);
> +void erofs_inode_fixup_chunkformat(struct erofs_inode *inode);
>   int erofs_write_chunk_indexes(struct erofs_inode *inode, struct erofs_vfile *vf,
>   			      erofs_off_t off);
>   int erofs_blob_write_chunked_file(struct erofs_inode *inode, int fd,
> diff --git a/lib/blobchunk.c b/lib/blobchunk.c
> index a051904..96c161b 100644
> --- a/lib/blobchunk.c
> +++ b/lib/blobchunk.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,42 @@ static int erofs_blob_hashmap_cmp(const void *a, const void *b,
>   		      sizeof(ec1->sha256));
>   }
>   

...


>   int erofs_write_chunk_indexes(struct erofs_inode *inode, struct erofs_vfile *vf,
>   			      erofs_off_t off)
>   {
> @@ -380,10 +416,6 @@ int erofs_blob_write_chunked_file(struct erofs_inode *inode, int fd,
>   			goto err;
>   		}
>   
> -		/* FIXME! `chunk->blkaddr` is not the final blkaddr here */
> -		if (chunk->blkaddr != EROFS_NULL_ADDR &&
> -		    chunk->blkaddr >= UINT32_MAX)
> -			inode->u.chunkformat |= EROFS_CHUNK_FORMAT_48BIT;
>   		if (!erofs_blob_can_merge(sbi, lastch, chunk)) {
>   			erofs_update_minextblks(sbi, interval_start, pos,
>   						&minextblks);
> diff --git a/lib/inode.c b/lib/inode.c
> index 4a214f9..7a1d982 100644
> --- a/lib/inode.c
> +++ b/lib/inode.c
> @@ -908,6 +908,9 @@ static int erofs_bh_flush_write_inode(struct erofs_buffer_head *bh, bool abort)
>   
>   	DBG_BUGON(inode->bh != bh);
>   	if (!abort) {
> +		if (inode->datalayout == EROFS_INODE_CHUNK_BASED &&
> +		    inode->chunkindexes)
> +			erofs_inode_fixup_chunkformat(inode);

How about moving this into erofs_iflush() rather than here?

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

>   		ret = erofs_iflush(inode);
>   		if (ret)
>   			return ret;



  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-24  5:57 [PATCH] blobchunk: fix 48-bit format detection to use final remapped block addresses puneeth_aditya_5656
2026-02-24  6:44 ` Gao Xiang
2026-02-24 16:37 ` [PATCH v2] erofs-utils: lib: fix 48bit addressing detection for chunk-based format puneeth_aditya_5656
2026-02-24 17:44   ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2026-02-24 19:10 ` puneeth_aditya_5656
2026-02-24 19:13 ` [PATCH v3] " puneeth_aditya_5656
2026-02-25  3:55   ` Gao Xiang
2026-02-25  7:39 ` [PATCH v4] " puneeth_aditya_5656
2026-02-25  8:19   ` Gao Xiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6abf29f-db3f-40f0-8504-0c987db0ebcd@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=myakampuneeth@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox