Linux-EROFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: "Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@ionkov.net>,
	"Konstantin Komarov" <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"Anders Larsen" <al@alarsen.net>,
	"Carlos Llamas" <cmllamas@google.com>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Mattia Dongili" <malattia@linux.it>,
	"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
	"John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Mike Marshall" <hubcap@omnibond.com>,
	"Paulo Alcantara" <pc@manguebit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	devel@lists.orangefs.org,
	"Shyam Prasad N" <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@kernel.org>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 87/87] fs: move i_blocks up a few places in struct inode
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:01:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f88106b26a2b647a1541d049999d5546d2ee3e51.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjSrgGr+6UOs4ADGYCderpQ7hAaPjNmB1DExAPLQQsHSg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 14:35 +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:06 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > The recent change to use discrete integers instead of struct timespec64
> > in struct inode shaved 8 bytes off of it, but it also moves the i_lock
> > into the previous cacheline, away from the fields that it protects.
> > 
> > Move i_blocks up above the i_lock, which moves the new 4 byte hole to
> > just after the timestamps, without changing the size of the structure.
> > 
> 
> Instead of creating an implicit hole, can you please move i_generation
> to fill the 4 bytes hole.
> 
> It makes sense in the same cache line with i_ino and I could
> use the vacant 4 bytes hole above i_fsnotify_mask to expand the
> mask to 64bit (the 32bit event mask space is running out).
> 
> Thanks,
> Amir.
> 

Sounds like a plan. Resulting struct inode size is the same (616 bytes
with my kdevops kconfig). BTW: all of these changes are in my "amtime"
branch if anyone wants to pull them down.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-07  1:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28 11:05 [PATCH 85/87] fs: rename i_atime and i_mtime fields to __i_atime and __i_mtime Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 11:05 ` [PATCH 86/87] fs: switch timespec64 fields in inode to discrete integers Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 15:48   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-09-28 17:06     ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 17:19       ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-09-28 17:40         ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 20:21           ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-09-28 21:26           ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-09-29  0:18             ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-29  3:50               ` Amir Goldstein
2023-09-29 16:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-29  6:32           ` David Howells
2023-09-30 14:50             ` Steve French
2023-10-01  5:01               ` [OT] " Gabriel Paubert
2023-09-29  3:27         ` Amir Goldstein
2023-09-29  9:44       ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-29 10:16         ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 17:09   ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 11:05 ` [PATCH 87/87] fs: move i_blocks up a few places in struct inode Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 11:35   ` Amir Goldstein
2023-09-28 12:01     ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-09-28 17:41   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-28 18:01     ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-29  9:32     ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f88106b26a2b647a1541d049999d5546d2ee3e51.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=al@alarsen.net \
    --cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=devel@lists.orangefs.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=malattia@linux.it \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox