From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF54C4321E for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232243AbiLAQee (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:34:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52706 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229630AbiLAQed (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:34:33 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f69.google.com (mail-io1-f69.google.com [209.85.166.69]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C9AA9E83 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 08:34:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-f69.google.com with SMTP id r197-20020a6b8fce000000b006c3fc33424dso2029440iod.5 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:34:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:from:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UKNN3axs1y811QkhsVcYtMf113asLOYvCITq8yCsIOI=; b=UcaRqwxPI02qxvCXLaW2yDxbr3tfkQuwQA+Y2mzUsCq4KRIFRLXCi5EMp8yqglhLzz yEUDs0fPBOzbC5HIKNgQL3JTIQtQuM1RplFM7ijRnd2qvuOEGbhECxKBaLXKqZiZr9d/ soly6vKgGPn6LyG4/i2p1pi+MW0q+PNKXgUq3YnBrajkhRUYK9SrayAAV3VMo+pT2YW1 F3cMXvpkBsfVpzqfCBrRq85rkQodeU0ld3kexKtd6TrpNdEg8jNen/rM3kL8z05nKf8Z ge0C6UmraYJhaLsKfXSKE0HV7sMrN9v6DPW+Z3lWw1dZkJcWCfYL/CvBcL3jFFwgzWpa 3g4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmMEeypJUEv91EdqPd9qnJpk9PaExCh4cbD5NsbExgvHSX91k0+ vnRe2ujF+/JQHuwXxclbmH86wLPpyMcnGZPM0ApdmRlNA7wP X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4QsSf1RfaffekqeYnhim3TQSpIXqCXD7AhIKoXzfukEk/NduogwSXw23qNdA3B36SI0rQ3mzU6CxJ96hdkg4dHKHsaUPFE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a92:cbcd:0:b0:302:a682:4867 with SMTP id s13-20020a92cbcd000000b00302a6824867mr28386527ilq.214.1669912471753; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:34:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:34:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: <0000000000006c411605e2f127e5@google.com> X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <000000000000af5eb905eec6cb85@google.com> Subject: Re: kernel BUG in ext4_free_blocks (2) From: syzbot To: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, lczerner@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sashal@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-android-bugs@googlegroups.com, tadeusz.struk@linaro.org, tytso@mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org This bug is marked as fixed by commit: ext4: block range must be validated before use in ext4_mb_clear_bb() But I can't find it in any tested tree for more than 90 days. Is it a correct commit? Please update it by replying: #syz fix: exact-commit-title Until then the bug is still considered open and new crashes with the same signature are ignored.