From: "Stephen Elliott" <techweb@ntlworld.com>
To: "'Theodore Ts'o'" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "'Andreas Dilger'" <adilger@dilger.ca>, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 2nd Attempt - FSCK Errors
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 14:31:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002701ce4802$8c4e4fc0$a4eaef40$@ntlworld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130503131421.GC32297@thunk.org>
Well... Funny enough, the device which I ran debugfs on was the other
ReadyNAS device, not the one with the issue anyway. I wanted to test it
first.
I suspect the underlying architecture supporting RAID in these devices
screws with the debugfs interface.
I just find it bizarre that I get the same message regarding multiply
assigned blocks in 0 files on every FSCK as in it never gets resolved.
But... No issues with file access or no bad logs etc. I do have a case open
with Netgear support, since this is basically an appliance.
-----Original Message-----
From: Theodore Ts'o [mailto:tytso@mit.edu]
Sent: 03 May 2013 14:14
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: 'Andreas Dilger'; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2nd Attempt - FSCK Errors
What you've shown us makes me suspicious about whether the hardware device
is sane or not. In the previous e2fsck run, it set i_size to a non-zero
value. Yet when debugfs tries to read the same inode, it's now seeing all
zero's.
So that implies the disk (or software raid device; you haven't been clear
what the underlying storage is for this file system) is not returning the
same information for a particular block as was previously written.
If the underlying block device is not stable, there really is nothing for
e2fsck to do. You might want to check /var/log/messages for any error
messages relating to the underlying storage device(s). If you're seeing I/O
errors in the log files, that would be another hint.
At this point, my recommendation to you is to find a separate disk (or RAID
array if necessary) which is as big as the underlying disk, and do an image
copy (via dd or ddrescue) to a known-good storage device, and then retry the
e2fsck on this copy of the file system.
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-03 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 14:00 2nd Attempt - FSCK Errors Stephen Elliott
2013-04-30 16:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-04-30 16:25 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-04-30 17:58 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-03 10:55 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-03 13:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-05-03 13:31 ` Stephen Elliott [this message]
2013-05-03 15:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-05-03 18:42 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-03 21:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-05-05 11:19 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-08 14:45 ` Stephen Elliott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002701ce4802$8c4e4fc0$a4eaef40$@ntlworld.com' \
--to=techweb@ntlworld.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).