Re: (un)lock_kernel() ?

[Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 12:03 -0400, Ming Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 12:52 -0400, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> > > According to Documentation/filesystems/Locking, ->get_sb() is called
> > > with the BKL held, but looking through the code, I'm not able to find
> > > where it is being taken.
> > 
> > I noticed that too. Unless I'm just dumb and can't see it, I'm not able to 
> > find any BKL references during filesystem mounting until you get into 
> > FS-specific code. I looked through everything from sys_mount through to 
> > vfs_kern_mount. Documentation/filesystems/porting talks about several 
> > situations where the VFS code was modified to not take the BKL, and BLK 
> > calls were added by FS non-maintainers for safety until each FS could be 
> > audited independently, but that wouldn't be the case, would it?
> 
> 
> sys_mount->do_mount->do_new_mount->do_kern_mount path
> 
> part of sys_mount()
> 
> 1570                 goto out3;
> 1571 
> 1572         lock_kernel();
> 1573         retval = do_mount((char *)dev_page, dir_page, (char *)type_page,
> 1574                           flags, (void *)data_page);
> 1575         unlock_kernel();
> 1576         free_page(data_page);
> 1577 
> 1578 out3:
> 1579         free_page(dev_page)

Thanks.  I missed that somehow.  It seems the documentation is correct.
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center