Re: which tree should I generate the ext4 patch ?

[coly <colyli@gmail.com>]

Theodore,

I can see all the files, but how can I download the files by cvs ? I
tried pserver, but it seems does not work ..

could you give me some hints ?

Thanks

Coly

在 2007-05-23三的 08:17 -0400，Theodore Tso写道：
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:00:43PM +0800, coly wrote:
> > 
> > These days, I am tring to post my patch for inode reservation on
> > linux-ext4. But I am confused on which tree I should generate the patch.
> > 
> > I worked on mm-tree. But now Thoedore creates a tree for ext4, so should
> > I generate the patch based on tso-tree ?
> 
> The mm-tree is fed from the ext4 patch series, so there shouldn't be
> much difference.
> 
> > Same question to e2fsprogs. I guess maybe I should generate the patch
> > for e2fsprogs based on e2fsprogs-TEST branch, a.k.a 1.40-WIP-0407. Isn't
> > it ?
> 
> Yes, or if you want to use the very latest, you can use the Mercurial
> repository located at:
> 
> 	http://thunk.org/hg/e2fsprogs
> 
> I will be switch to git at some point in the near future, probably
> after the e2fsprogs 1.40 release, but for now that's the place to get
> the very latest.  
> 
> In practice, it's not hard to rebase patches, but patches against the
> more recent versions are definitely appreciated.  So if you're not
> familiar with using Mercurial, please feel free to use the
> 1.40-WIP-0407 as the base for your patches.  
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> 					- Ted