From: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Multiple mount protection
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:39:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1180645773.3922.8.camel@garfield> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070531161627.GE19088@thunk.org>
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:16 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:28:33AM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> >
> > So can I assume that the INCOMPAT_MMP flag and the s_mmp_interval and
> > s_mmp_block superblock fields will be reserved regardless of whether the
> > patches go into ext4? I had attached the patches in the last mail so you
> > can share your views on them.
>
> Yes, i've reserved the code point and superblock fields.
Thanks.
> I'm not going to add INCOMPAT_MMP flag to the supported file until I get and
> integrate the patch ext2fs_open() that actually tests for the flag,
> though, since that would be a bit silly.
>
> I assume the patch will add a flag to ext2fs_open which skips the MMP
> checking.
Yes I have added a EXT2_FLAG_SKIP_MMP flag to ext2fs_open() to bypass
MMP which will be set if tunefs is used with -f option. Also MMP check
will not be run if the filesystem is being opened readonly.
Thanks,
Kalpak.
> After all, tune2fs is allowed to make changes to the
> superblock while the filesystem is mounted. So it needs to be able to
> open the filesystem read/only even if it is mounted.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-31 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-21 19:52 [RFC][PATCH] Multiple mount protection Kalpak Shah
2007-05-22 7:15 ` Manoj Joseph
2007-05-22 7:34 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-05-22 7:53 ` Manoj Joseph
2007-05-22 8:06 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-05-24 23:25 ` Karel Zak
2007-05-25 6:44 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-05-25 14:39 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-25 19:31 ` Jim Garlick
2007-05-25 21:36 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-05-30 20:58 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-05-31 16:16 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-31 21:09 ` Kalpak Shah [this message]
2007-06-01 8:46 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 8:27 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-06-01 9:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-06-01 10:56 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 11:41 ` Theodore Tso
2007-06-01 12:13 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 13:52 ` Theodore Tso
2007-06-01 18:00 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1180645773.3922.8.camel@garfield \
--to=kalpak@clusterfs.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox