From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Kleikamp Subject: Re: [2/3] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions v2 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:31:41 -0500 Message-ID: <1190125901.6528.7.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> References: <46EB3E94.7080704@googlemail.com> <46EB4371.307@googlemail.com> <20070918142443.GA13304@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michal Piotrowski , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, Andy Whitcroft , sct@redhat.com, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Shish , Karl Meyer , Francois Romieu , Daniel Drake , Oliver Neukum , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Florian Lohoff , Toralf F?rster To: Jan Kara Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070918142443.GA13304@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:24 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > Subject : umount triggers a warning in jfs and takes almost a minute > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/73 > > Last known good : ? > > Submitter : Oliver Neukum > > Caused-By : ? > > Handled-By : ? > > Status : unknown > I thought Shaggy asked Oliver about some details (and he did not > answer so far) so I'd assume Shaggy is handling this. I've put it on the back-burner since I haven't heard back from Oliver. I still haven't found out whether or not it is a regression. I'm not too concerned about fixing it right away. I don't think jfs on flash is very important. -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center