linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: adilger@clusterfs.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] ext4: Convert s_blocks_count_hi and s_blocks_count to le32_t
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:33:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11907110613446-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11907110501570-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Convert s_blocks_count_hi and s_blocks_count to le32_t
This helps in finding BUGs due to direct partial access of
these split 64 bit values

Also fix direct partial access in ext4 code

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c       |    4 ++--
 fs/ext4/super.c         |    4 ++--
 include/linux/ext4_fs.h |   12 ++++++------
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index c4e6c92..5b804b2 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4036,7 +4036,7 @@ int ext4_mb_initialize_context(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	/* start searching from the goal */
 	goal = ar->goal;
 	if (goal < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
-			goal >= le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count))
+			goal >= ext4_blocks_count(es))
 		goal = le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);
 	ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, goal, &group, &block);
 
@@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ void ext4_mb_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 	es = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es;
 	if (block < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
 	    block + count < block ||
-	    block + count > le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count)) {
+	    block + count > ext4_blocks_count(es)) {
 		ext4_error(sb, __FUNCTION__,
 			    "Freeing blocks not in datazone - "
 			    "block = %lu, count = %lu", block, count);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index b9dda19..069d5f3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -2653,7 +2653,7 @@ static int ext4_statfs (struct dentry * dentry, struct kstatfs * buf)
 
 	if (test_opt(sb, MINIX_DF)) {
 		sbi->s_overhead_last = 0;
-	} else if (sbi->s_blocks_last != le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count)) {
+	} else if (sbi->s_blocks_last != ext4_blocks_count(es)) {
 		unsigned long ngroups = sbi->s_groups_count, i;
 		ext4_fsblk_t overhead = 0;
 		smp_rmb();
@@ -2688,7 +2688,7 @@ static int ext4_statfs (struct dentry * dentry, struct kstatfs * buf)
 		overhead += ngroups * (2 + sbi->s_itb_per_group);
 		sbi->s_overhead_last = overhead;
 		smp_wmb();
-		sbi->s_blocks_last = le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count);
+		sbi->s_blocks_last = ext4_blocks_count(es);
 	}
 
 	buf->f_type = EXT4_SUPER_MAGIC;
diff --git a/include/linux/ext4_fs.h b/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
index 84ef557..53a8665 100644
--- a/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ do {									       \
  */
 struct ext4_super_block {
 /*00*/	__le32	s_inodes_count;		/* Inodes count */
-	__le32	s_blocks_count;		/* Blocks count */
+	le32_t	s_blocks_count;		/* Blocks count */
 	__le32	s_r_blocks_count;	/* Reserved blocks count */
 	__le32	s_free_blocks_count;	/* Free blocks count */
 /*10*/	__le32	s_free_inodes_count;	/* Free inodes count */
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ struct ext4_super_block {
 	__le32	s_mkfs_time;		/* When the filesystem was created */
 	__le32	s_jnl_blocks[17];	/* Backup of the journal inode */
 	/* 64bit support valid if EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_64BIT */
-/*150*/	__le32	s_blocks_count_hi;	/* Blocks count */
+/*150*/	le32_t	s_blocks_count_hi;	/* Blocks count */
 	__le32	s_r_blocks_count_hi;	/* Reserved blocks count */
 	__le32	s_free_blocks_count_hi;	/* Free blocks count */
 	__le16	s_min_extra_isize;	/* All inodes have at least # bytes */
@@ -1066,8 +1066,8 @@ extern void ext4_inode_table_set(struct super_block *sb,
 
 static inline ext4_fsblk_t ext4_blocks_count(struct ext4_super_block *es)
 {
-	return ((ext4_fsblk_t)le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count_hi) << 32) |
-		le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count);
+	return ((ext4_fsblk_t)le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count_hi.value) << 32) |
+		le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count.value);
 }
 
 static inline ext4_fsblk_t ext4_r_blocks_count(struct ext4_super_block *es)
@@ -1085,8 +1085,8 @@ static inline ext4_fsblk_t ext4_free_blocks_count(struct ext4_super_block *es)
 static inline void ext4_blocks_count_set(struct ext4_super_block *es,
 					 ext4_fsblk_t blk)
 {
-	es->s_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32((u32)blk);
-	es->s_blocks_count_hi = cpu_to_le32(blk >> 32);
+	es->s_blocks_count.value = cpu_to_le32((u32)blk);
+	es->s_blocks_count_hi.value = cpu_to_le32(blk >> 32);
 }
 
 static inline void ext4_free_blocks_count_set(struct ext4_super_block *es,
-- 
1.5.3.1.91.gd3392-dirty

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-25  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-25  9:03 [PATCH 1/7] ext4: Introduce le32_t and le16_t Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25  9:03 ` [PATCH 2/7] ext4: Convert bg_inode_bitmap and bg_inode_table to new type Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25  9:03   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2007-09-25  9:03     ` [PATCH 4/7] ext4: Convert s_r_blocks_count[_hi] s_free_blocks_count[_hi] to le32_t Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25  9:03       ` [PATCH 5/7] ext4: Convert ext4_extent.ee_start and ee_start_hi to le32_t and le16_t Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25  9:03         ` [PATCH 6/7] ext4: Convert ext4_extent_idx.ei_leaf and ei_leaf_hi " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25  9:03           ` [PATCH 7/7] ext4: sparse fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25  9:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] ext4: Introduce le32_t and le16_t Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25 10:01   ` Andreas Dilger
2007-09-25 10:51     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25 13:56 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-09-25 15:45   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-09-25 16:02     ` Dave Kleikamp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11907110613446-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).