From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
Avantika Mathur <mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: update uninitialized-block-groups.patch and mballoc-core.patch
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:44:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191458688.3810.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4703E7B0.7060900@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Updated ext4 patch queue with your updated uninit blk group and mballoc
patch.
Mingming
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 00:34 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >
> >
> > Andreas Dilger wrote:
> >> On Oct 03, 2007 15:30 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >>> + if (block_group == sbi->s_gdb_count - 1) {
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Even though mke2fs always initialize first and last group
> >>> + * if some other tool enabled the EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT we need
> >>> + * to make sure we calculate the right free blocks
> >>> + */
> >>> + free_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) -
> >>> + le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
> >>> + (EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * sbi->s_groups_count) -
> >>> + bit_max;
> >>
> >> Did you verify that subtracting s_first_data_block is indeed the right
> >> thing to do. I _think_ yes, but I didn't look at it very closely when
> >> I wrote it late last night.
> >>
> >
> > yes s_first_data_block is always decremented to find total number of
> > blocks occupied by the reset of the group. But now looking at it again i
> > guess i need to have
>
>
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> index 8613914..34b1e11 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ unsigned ext4_init_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head *bh,
> {
> unsigned long start;
> int bit, bit_max;
> - unsigned free_blocks;
> + unsigned free_blocks, group_blocks;
> struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>
> if (bh) {
> @@ -96,14 +96,15 @@ unsigned ext4_init_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head *bh,
> * if some other tool enabled the EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT we need
> * to make sure we calculate the right free blocks
> */
> - free_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) -
> - le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
> - (EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * sbi->s_groups_count) -
> - bit_max;
> + group_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) -
> + le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
> + (EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * (sbi->s_groups_count -1));
> } else {
> - free_blocks = EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - bit_max;
> + group_blocks = EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb);
> }
>
> + free_blocks = group_blocks - bit_max;
> +
> if (bh) {
> for (bit = 0; bit < bit_max; bit++)
> ext4_set_bit(bit, bh->b_data);
> @@ -123,8 +124,7 @@ unsigned ext4_init_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head *bh,
> * blocksize * 8 ( which is the size of bitmap ), set rest of the
> * block bitmap to 1
> */
> - mark_bitmap_end(EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb),
> - sb->s_blocksize * 8, bh->b_data);
> + mark_bitmap_end(group_blocks, sb->s_blocksize * 8, bh->b_data);
> }
>
> return free_blocks - sbi->s_itb_per_group - 2;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-04 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-03 10:00 update uninitialized-block-groups.patch and mballoc-core.patch Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-03 18:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-10-03 18:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-03 19:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-04 0:44 ` Mingming Cao [this message]
2007-10-05 13:26 ` Valerie Clement
2007-10-05 15:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191458688.3810.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).