Re: merge plans, was Re: - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree

Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-05T09:45:47Z

On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:35:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:24:18 -0500
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 07:15:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:36:26 -0500 Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the
> > > > > ext4 patchset.
> > > >
> > > > That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up. How quickly
> > > > will you be able to merge David's iget converstion patches?
> > >
> > > They're about 1,000 patches back
> >
> > Care to post a merge plan so we have a slight chance to make sure not
> > too much crap is hiding in these 1000 patches?
>
> Pretty much everything up to
>
> #
> # end
> #
> reiser4-sb_sync_inodes.patch

That includes the git trees? Defintive NACK to unionfs.