From: "Frédéric Bohé" <frederic.bohe@bull.net>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] ext4: remove usage of Uptodate flag to initialize buddy after an online resize
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:56:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1224662205.3569.44.camel@frecb007923.frec.bull.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081021155228.GE15685@mit.edu>
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 11:52 -0400, Theodore Tso a écrit :
> Hi Frederic,
>
> Thanks for posting the update to your patch; I take it you've solved
> the race condition? I haven't take a look at your updated patch yet,
> but one thought that might make the potential race conditions much
> simpler to analyze and prevent.
Yes the race condition I found is solved with this patch. The issue
happened when concurrent threads try to write to blocks in groups which
had been added by the resizing. As I briefly explained in the patch, it
was a matter of mballocator's datas which were wrongly initialized
several times.
> At the moment, the resize code, just before it calls to fix up the
> mballoc data structures, calls ext4_free_blocks_sb() to mark the block
> bitmap as being freed. That call should really go away, as
> ext4_free_blocs_sb() is a remnant from the legacy block allocator, and
> in fact does a lot of extra stuff that is not needed by mballoc().
> Perhaps the right answer is that we should have one function that
> updates the block bitmap, as well as initializing the mballoc() data
> structures, and it would *only* be called from the resize code. If
OK, I will take a look at this function and see if I can update/clean
it.
> the concern is protecting against multiple resizers running at the
> same time, then let's either (a) not call unlock_super() until the
> mballoc data structures are initialized, or (b) create a new mutex
> that is explicit for use by the online resize code.
>
In fact, I have never tested with multiple resizers til now because I
never managed to run several instance of resize2fs concurrently: if a
resize2fs is running, the second one simply fails with a "device busy"
error.
Frederic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 14:44 [PATCH] ext4: remove usage of Uptodate flag to initialize buddy after an online resize Frédéric Bohé
2008-10-03 12:21 ` Frédéric Bohé
2008-10-21 15:16 ` [PATCH -v2] " Frédéric Bohé
2008-10-21 15:52 ` Theodore Tso
2008-10-22 7:56 ` Frédéric Bohé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1224662205.3569.44.camel@frecb007923.frec.bull.fr \
--to=frederic.bohe@bull.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox