linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] ext4: ext4_mark_recovery_complete() doesn't need to use lock_super
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:49:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240717765-16572-4-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240717765-16572-3-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>

The function ext4_mark_recovery_complete() is called from two call
paths: either (a) while mounting the filesystem, in which case there's
no danger of any other CPU calling write_super() until the mount is
completed, and (b) while remounting the filesystem read-write, in
which case the fs core has already locked the superblock, and in any
case write_super() wouldn't be called until the filesystem is
successfully changed from being mounted read-only to read-write.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c |   11 +----------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index e0b0c9f..176d43f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3198,14 +3198,12 @@ static void ext4_mark_recovery_complete(struct super_block *sb,
 	if (jbd2_journal_flush(journal) < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	lock_super(sb);
 	if (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER) &&
 	    sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) {
 		EXT4_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
 		sb->s_dirt = 0;
 		ext4_commit_super(sb, es, 1);
 	}
-	unlock_super(sb);
 
 out:
 	jbd2_journal_unlock_updates(journal);
@@ -3438,15 +3436,8 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
 			    (sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_VALID_FS))
 				es->s_state = cpu_to_le16(sbi->s_mount_state);
 
-			/*
-			 * We have to unlock super so that we can wait for
-			 * transactions.
-			 */
-			if (sbi->s_journal) {
-				unlock_super(sb);
+			if (sbi->s_journal)
 				ext4_mark_recovery_complete(sb, es);
-				lock_super(sb);
-			}
 		} else {
 			int ret;
 			if ((ret = EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
-- 
1.5.6.3


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-26  3:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-26  3:49 [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate most lock_super() calls from ext4 Theodore Ts'o
2009-04-26  3:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] ext4: Avoid races caused by on-line resizing and SMP memory reordering Theodore Ts'o
2009-04-26  3:49   ` [PATCH 2/5] ext4: Remove outdated comment about lock_super() Theodore Ts'o
2009-04-26  3:49     ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2009-04-26  3:49       ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: Replace lock/unlock_super() with an explicit lock for the orphan list Theodore Ts'o
2009-04-26  3:49         ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: Replace lock/unlock_super() with an explicit lock for resizing Theodore Ts'o
2009-04-28 16:02           ` Jan Kara
2009-04-28 15:52         ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: Replace lock/unlock_super() with an explicit lock for the orphan list Jan Kara
2009-04-26  7:07       ` [PATCH 3/5] ext4: ext4_mark_recovery_complete() doesn't need to use lock_super Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-26 11:46         ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-26 11:49           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-28 16:13     ` [PATCH 2/5] ext4: Remove outdated comment about lock_super() Jan Kara
2009-04-28 16:23   ` [PATCH 1/5] ext4: Avoid races caused by on-line resizing and SMP memory reordering Jan Kara
2009-04-28 17:14     ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-29  9:28       ` Jan Kara
2009-05-01 13:55       ` [PATCH v2] " Theodore Ts'o
2009-05-03 17:08         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1240717765-16572-4-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).