From: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:21:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281129719.7357.30.camel@keith-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100806191439.GD24583@thunk.org>
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 15:14 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:07:13PM -0700, Keith Mannthey wrote:
> > This is a collection of benchmark runs with the FFSB test suite. The
> > results are comparable to other raid results on the boxacle server.
> >
> > The latest results can be found at:
> > http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5.html
> >
> > I added XFS without barriers and EXT3 with barriers into the mix since
> > my last data set.
>
> Thanks, it's good to know there haven't been any major regression on
> the ext4 side.
>
> If you could have a chance to run a set of benchmark runs with the
> jbd2 scalability patches, I'd be hugely interested to see how much
> difference they make.
Yes I am running with those today. As the system is only a 16-way or so
it will be interesting to see the impact.
I also have a few barrier reduction patchset test runs as well. I will
work to put them all together and publish some ext4 only relevant run in
the next few days.
Thanks,
Keith
> Thanks again!
>
> - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-06 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-06 19:07 Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5 Keith Mannthey
2010-08-06 19:14 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-06 21:21 ` Keith Mannthey [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1281129719.7357.30.camel@keith-laptop \
--to=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).