linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5
@ 2010-08-06 19:07 Keith Mannthey
  2010-08-06 19:14 ` Ted Ts'o
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keith Mannthey @ 2010-08-06 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ext4

This is a collection of benchmark runs with the FFSB test suite. The
results are comparable to other raid results on the boxacle server. 

The latest results can be found at: 
http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5.html

I added XFS without barriers and EXT3 with barriers into the mix since
my last data set. 

In general things look about the same.  There are a few cases where ext4
with barriers (default) has gotten better but ext4 without barriers has
gotten worse. 

Thanks,
  Keith Mannthey 
  LTC Local FileSystem 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5
  2010-08-06 19:07 Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5 Keith Mannthey
@ 2010-08-06 19:14 ` Ted Ts'o
  2010-08-06 21:21   ` Keith Mannthey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ted Ts'o @ 2010-08-06 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keith Mannthey; +Cc: linux-ext4

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:07:13PM -0700, Keith Mannthey wrote:
> This is a collection of benchmark runs with the FFSB test suite. The
> results are comparable to other raid results on the boxacle server. 
> 
> The latest results can be found at: 
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5.html
> 
> I added XFS without barriers and EXT3 with barriers into the mix since
> my last data set. 

Thanks, it's good to know there haven't been any major regression on
the ext4 side.

If you could have a chance to run a set of benchmark runs with the
jbd2 scalability patches, I'd be hugely interested to see how much
difference they make.

Thanks again!

						- Ted

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5
  2010-08-06 19:14 ` Ted Ts'o
@ 2010-08-06 21:21   ` Keith Mannthey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keith Mannthey @ 2010-08-06 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ted Ts'o; +Cc: linux-ext4

On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 15:14 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:07:13PM -0700, Keith Mannthey wrote:
> > This is a collection of benchmark runs with the FFSB test suite. The
> > results are comparable to other raid results on the boxacle server. 
> > 
> > The latest results can be found at: 
> > http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5.html
> > 
> > I added XFS without barriers and EXT3 with barriers into the mix since
> > my last data set. 
> 
> Thanks, it's good to know there haven't been any major regression on
> the ext4 side.
> 
> If you could have a chance to run a set of benchmark runs with the
> jbd2 scalability patches, I'd be hugely interested to see how much
> difference they make.

Yes I am running with those today.  As the system is only a 16-way or so
it will be interesting to see the impact. 

I also have a few barrier reduction patchset test runs as well.  I will
work to put them all together and publish some ext4 only relevant run in
the next few days.  

Thanks,
  Keith 


> Thanks again!
> 
> 						- Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-06 21:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-06 19:07 Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5 Keith Mannthey
2010-08-06 19:14 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-06 21:21   ` Keith Mannthey

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).