From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Arun Bhanu <ab@arunbhanu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [BUG?] memory hotplug: include/linux/radix-tree.h:145 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:01:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291748509.19276.62.camel@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101122061619.GA2764@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I got the same warning as reported by Arun Bhanu in "[BUG?] [Ext4] INFO:
suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage" during memory hotplug test on
2.6.37-rc5, see below.
migrate_pages() -> unmap_and_move() only calls rcu_read_lock() for anonymous
pages, as introduced by git commit 989f89c57e6361e7d16fbd9572b5da7d313b073d.
This should be ok, as the comment suggests, so the warning is probably a
false positive. Eventually, migrate_page_move_mapping() will call
radix_tree_deref_slot() with tree_lock held, but w/o rcu_read_lock() for
non-anonymous pages.
As suggested by Milton before, a new version of radix_tree_deref_slot that
uses rcu_dereference_protected could help, if this is a false positive, or
maybe the rcu_read_lock() should be called for all pages, not just anonymous.
Any thoughts?
===================================================
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---------------------------------------------------
include/linux/radix-tree.h:145 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
6 locks held by sh/960:
#0: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<00000000002afa7a>] sysfs_write_file+0x4a/0x1a8
#1: (s_active#52){.+.+.+}, at: [<00000000002afb02>] sysfs_write_file+0xd2/0x1a8
#2: (&mem->state_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<0000000000404d78>] memory_block_change_state+0x40/0x1a0
#3: (mem_hotplug_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<00000000002242c4>] lock_memory_hotplug+0x2c/0x44
#4: (pm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<000000000022483c>] remove_memory+0x104/0x758
#5: (&(&inode->i_data.tree_lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<000000000022624a>] migrate_page_move_mapping+0x4a/0x2d8
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 Not tainted 2.6.37-rc5 #2
Process sh (pid: 960, task: 0000000018e38640, ksp: 000000000f037818)
000000000f037ad8 000000000f037a58 0000000000000002 0000000000000000
000000000f037af8 000000000f037a70 000000000f037a70 0000000000567c42
0000000000000000 0000000017bd7e78 0000000000000002 0000000017bd2e30
000003e00000000d 000003e00000000c 000000000f037ac0 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 0000000000100bfa 000000000f037a58 000000000f037a98
Call Trace:
([<0000000000100b02>] show_trace+0xee/0x144)
[<00000000002263ea>] migrate_page_move_mapping+0x1ea/0x2d8
[<0000000000226b1c>] migrate_page+0x38/0x68
[<0000000000226c36>] move_to_new_page+0xea/0x2bc
[<00000000002276f6>] migrate_pages+0x496/0x568
[<0000000000224be6>] remove_memory+0x4ae/0x758
[<0000000000404e20>] memory_block_change_state+0xe8/0x1a0
[<0000000000404fda>] store_mem_state+0x102/0x138
[<00000000002afb26>] sysfs_write_file+0xf6/0x1a8
[<000000000023357c>] vfs_write+0xac/0x18c
[<0000000000233758>] SyS_write+0x58/0xa8
[<0000000000113976>] sysc_noemu+0x16/0x1c
[<0000020000162edc>] 0x20000162edc
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-07 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 11:26 [BUG?] [Ext4] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Arun Bhanu
2010-11-21 13:30 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-21 15:39 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 17:37 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-22 0:38 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-22 3:31 ` Milton Miller
2010-11-22 6:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-07 19:01 ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2010-12-08 1:19 ` [BUG?] memory hotplug: include/linux/radix-tree.h:145 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-16 13:50 ` Gerald Schaefer
2010-12-17 0:04 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 5:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-17 15:08 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17 8:39 ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-17 9:28 ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-17 15:22 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 15:13 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-23 7:16 ` [BUG?] [Ext4] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291748509.19276.62.camel@thinkpad \
--to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ab@arunbhanu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).